San Gimignano: reputations old and new
San Gimignano is one of those places that is too beautiful for its own good. Set in the steeply rolling hills on the western edge of Chianti, it is said to have four million visitors a year – and it is not difficult to see why. The thirteen remaining medieval towers and the lavishly restored old town have become a ‘must-see’ sight along with the leaning tower of Pisa and the sculpture of David in Florence. If you are here for the wine, you might spend as much time avoiding the town as visiting it. Nowadays it is encircled by car and bus parks in a way which might compete with any mediaeval siege.
The area has also been famous for wine for centuries going back to positive mentions in the city archives in 1276. More recently Vernaccia di San Gimignano was honoured in the world of Italian wine as the recipient of the very first DOC (appellation) in 1966. (It duly became a DOCG in 1993.) In a way it is surprising that the DOC system started with a white wine from a small area given the overwhelmingly greater importance of the red wines of Chianti in the twentieth century, but you shouldn’t expect Italian wine law to be terribly logical. The point is that the white wine made here is both made from a distinctive grape variety and from a defined area. These factors, perhaps helped by Italy-wide fame for those towers, were enough for it to lead it to the top of the queue.The USP of Vernaccia di San Gimignano is that it has more character than the standard Tuscan white blend of Trebbiano and Malvasia. And while this would not be difficult, the former being a hugely productive grape much given to dullness, this special Vernaccia can be just as pedestrian. Thus the problem for Vernaccia is to live up to its supposedly lofty reputation. The towers might soar into the Tuscan sky, but the wine rarely gets above the banal The great majority of the production is inexpensive and intended to be sold quickly to tourists.
In recent times the Consorzio has been working hard on the uniqueness of the grape variety, now shown to be distinct from the other Italian Vernaccia. The Consorzio has commissioned a research company related to the University of Siena to carry out a project to enable the genuine Vernaccia di San Gimignano to be traced according to its DNA profile. While this is very worthy, it is just as important for them to put their efforts into getting the general quality level up to the standards near the very best. That would really get the world to take note of Vernaccia di San Gimignano.
On our visit of late July 2012, Janet and I had the good fortune to visit two top producers, both in the località of Santa Margharita. This is a surreal experience in itself. You leave the town just by the office of the Carabinieri and one of the numerous car parks and go down a ‘white road’, ie an unadopted road which can change from tarmac to dust and back again every few metres. In minutes you leave the bustle of the modern tourist resort and come first to the conventional winery of Panizzi and then to the farm and home known as Montenidoli. At the latter, you are in another world of ancient landscapes, steep tracks, vineyards and forest, and a highly individual winemaker, Elisabetta Fagiuoli. She will claim that the land is her winemaker but there is no doubt her imprint is on every bottle.
Montenidoli
Whites
Reds
Panizzi: realising potential
Vernaccia di San Gimignano 2011 – 100% Vernaccia di San Gimignano variety and made and briefly aged solely in stainless steel. Given that this is the entry-level wine it would be easy to skip over it in the rush to the top wines to follow but that would be a mistake. This is in many ways the standard-bearer for Panizzi as it is made in larger numbers. For a wine made from pressed grapes with no maceration on the skins, this is surprisingly complex, with striking lemon, herbal and vegetal aromas, a well-structured palate and substantial mineral, salty finish. Not surprisingly we saw it being offered in some excellent restaurants both in the town and further afield.
Vigna Santa Margharita, Vernaccia di San Gimignano, 2010 – a single vineyard Vernaccia, part of which is aged for 5 months in used barriques and part in stainless steel. A very different nose with hints of oak with the barrique treatment being surprisingly obvious on the palate too. This is perhaps a testament as much to the freshness of the fruit in the simpler wine above, as to this wine itself. Longer, rounded and more structured in the mouth.
Vernaccia di San Gimignano Riserva 2008 – by contrast this wine, made from the selected best grapes, has spent a whole year in new barriques. But with the extra bottle age (the wine is now four years’ old), the integration between oak and fruit is very successful. Caramel notes on the nose, very good depth of fruit with those vegetal hints heading off in the direction of green olives. Well structured with a some wood tannins evident on the palate.
Evoé, Vernaccia di San Gimignano, 2007 – a markedly different colour, gold rather than lemon, which you can see in the fourth bottle above. This is a second example of ‘tradizionale’ in that it the must has been left on the skins for four weeks and then on the lees for 10 months to extract every last drop of richness and concentration from the fully ripe grapes. Pronounced nose of both fresh and dried fruit, excellent concentration, fair length if with a slightly drying finish. As the Italians say, ‘particolare’.
As we noted above, the reputation of the wine of San Gimignano goes back at last to the thirteenth century. The good news is that today at least some of the pioneers of modern Vernaccia di San Gimignano are producing wines of real character and note. The great majority of good to great Tuscan wines may be red, but this Vernaccia shows that Tuscany also has an indigenous heritage of really worthwhile whites, to complement its natural and manmade beauty.